Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test

By M. Toplak, R. F. West, K. Stanovich. 2014

785 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd81536a0b19575b8876c75787e2ccda59a0cb37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jala Rizeq
2. David B. Flora
3. Kinga Morsanyi
4. M. Toplak
5. Gordon Pennycook
6. Daniel M. Oppenheimer
7. K. S. Thomson
8. Christopher S. Hodkinson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kinga Morsanyi
2. Francesca Chiesi
3. Caterina Primi
4. M. Donati
5. Jala Rizeq
6. David B. Flora
7. J. Hamilton
8. Thomas J. Smelter

In General Decision Sciences

1. M. Toplak
2. Kinga Morsanyi
3. M. Donati
4. Francesca Chiesi
5. Caterina Primi
6. Jala Rizeq
7. David B. Flora
8. J. Hamilton

Citations in the corpus

• Are there gender differences in cognitive reflection? Invariance and differences related to mathematics (2018, background): “In a study conducted by Toplak et al. (2014) with Canadian university students, male students obtained higher scores than female students, not only on the original CRT, but also on four new items.”
• Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things) (2015, methodology): “But the evidence for a two-system view of hese items is strong (e.g., De Neys, 2006), so we use them anyway. oreover, Toplak, West, and Stanovich (2013) found that 8 beliefias items correlated.55 with the original CRT,.48 with a set of four rithmetic items like the original CRT, which, in turn,…”
• The development and testing of a new version of the cognitive reflection test applying item response theory (irt). (2016, positive): “Several previous studies reported gender differences in cognitive reflection (e.g. Campitelli & Gerrans, 2014; Frederick, 2005; Toplak et al., 2014).”
• Political Ideology Predicts Perceptions of the Threat of COVID-19 (and Susceptibility to Fake News About It) (2020, background): “The CRT contained nine items (a ¼ .735) taken from several sources (Baron et al., 2015; Oldrati et al., 2016; Primi et al., 2016; Thomson & Oppenheimer, 2016; Toplak et al., 2014).”
• An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes (2020, methodology): “The expanded seven-item version of the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; originally from Frederick, 2005; Toplak et al., 2014) was used.”