Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature

By Peter T. Nelson, I. Alafuzoff, Eileen Bigio, C. Bouras, H. Braak, Nigel J. Cairns, Rudolph Castellani, B. Crain, P. Davies, K. Del Tredici and 27 more. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 2012

1,882 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Clinicopathologic correlation studies are critically important for the field of Alzheimer disease (AD) research. Studies on human subjects with autopsy confirmation entail numerous potential biases that affect both their general applicability and the validity of the correlations. Many sources of data variability can weaken the apparent correlation between cognitive status and AD neuropathologic changes. Indeed, most persons in advanced old age have significant non-AD brain lesions that may alter cognition independently of AD. Worldwide research efforts have evaluated thousands of human subjects to assess the causes of cognitive impairment in the elderly, and these studies have been interpreted in different ways. We review the literature focusing on the correlation of AD neuropathologic changes (i.e. &bgr;-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) with cognitive impairment. We discuss the various patterns of brain changes that have been observed in elderly individuals to provide a perspective forunderstanding AD clinicopathologic correlation and conclude that evidence from many independent research centers strongly supports the existence of a specific disease, as defined by the presence of A&bgr; plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Although A&bgr; plaques may play a key role in AD pathogenesis, the severity of cognitive impairment correlates best with the burden of neocortical neurofibrillary tangles.

Subfields: Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bce678baa6d56ad7c06197507d7903b6c7619507

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physiology

  1. Dennis W. Dickson
  2. D. Holtzman
  3. J. Long
  4. William W. Seeley
  5. Thomas Wisniewski
  6. Eleanor Drummond
  7. J. Attems
  8. Bradley T. Hyman

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Dennis W. Dickson
  2. J. Long
  3. William W. Seeley
  4. Thomas Wisniewski
  5. Eleanor Drummond
  6. J. Attems
  7. A. Serrano‐Pozo
  8. E. Masliah

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Bradford C. Dickerson
  2. Jorge Sepulcre
  3. Bruce L. Miller
  4. Reisa A. Sperling
  5. Joel H. Kramer
  6. Keith A. Johnson
  7. William W. Seeley
  8. Olaf Sporns

Citations in the corpus