Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging

By John F. Crary, John Q. Trojanowski, Julie A. Schneider, J. Abisambra, E. Abner, I. Alafuzoff, S. Arnold, J. Attems, T. Beach, Eileen Bigio and 33 more. Acta Neuropathologica, 2014

1,348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We recommend a new term, “primary age-related tauopathy” (PART), to describe a pathology that is commonly observed in the brains of aged individuals. Many autopsy studies have reported brains with neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) that are indistinguishable from those of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), in the absence of amyloid (Aβ) plaques. For these “NFT+/Aβ−” brains, for which formal criteria for AD neuropathologic changes are not met, the NFTs are mostly restricted to structures in the medial temporal lobe, basal forebrain, brainstem, and olfactory areas (bulb and cortex). Symptoms in persons with PART usually range from normal to amnestic cognitive changes, with only a minority exhibiting profound impairment. Because cognitive impairment is often mild, existing clinicopathologic designations, such as “tangle-only dementia” and “tangle-predominant senile dementia”, are imprecise and not appropriate for most subjects. PART is almost universally detectable at autopsy among elderly individuals, yet this pathological process cannot be specifically identified pre-mortem at the present time. Improved biomarkers and tau imaging may enable diagnosis of PART in clinical settings in the future. Indeed, recent studies have identified a common biomarker profile consisting of temporal lobe atrophy and tauopathy without evidence of Aβ accumulation. For both researchers and clinicians, a revised nomenclature will raise awareness of this extremely common pathologic change while providing a conceptual foundation for future studies. Prior reports that have elucidated features of the pathologic entity we refer to as PART are discussed, and working neuropathological diagnostic criteria are proposed.

Subfields: Neurology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20a007f11ad0e16a4a1783e687f7530620df864c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neurology

  1. Dennis W. Dickson
  2. Brittany N. Dugger
  3. Kaj Blennow
  4. Julie A. Schneider
  5. Thomas Wisniewski
  6. Eleanor Drummond
  7. J. Attems
  8. David A. Bennett

In Physiology

  1. Kaj Blennow
  2. Dennis W. Dickson
  3. Clifford R. Jack Jr.
  4. Reisa A. Sperling
  5. Ronald C. Petersen
  6. Julie A. Schneider
  7. David A. Bennett
  8. Brittany N. Dugger

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Kaj Blennow
  2. Clifford R. Jack Jr.
  3. Dennis W. Dickson
  4. Ronald C. Petersen
  5. Julie A. Schneider
  6. David A. Bennett
  7. Reisa A. Sperling
  8. David S. Knopman

Citations in the corpus