A GPX4-dependent cancer cell state underlies the clear-cell morphology and confers sensitivity to ferroptosis

By Y. Zou, Michael J. Palte, A. Deik, Haoxin Li, J. Eaton, Wenyu Wang, Yuen-Yi Tseng, Rebecca Deasy, M. Kost-Alimova, V. Dancík and 10 more. Nature Communications, 2019

772 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Clear-cell carcinomas (CCCs) are a histological group of highly aggressive malignancies commonly originating in the kidney and ovary. CCCs are distinguished by aberrant lipid and glycogen accumulation and are refractory to a broad range of anti-cancer therapies. Here we identify an intrinsic vulnerability to ferroptosis associated with the unique metabolic state in CCCs. This vulnerability transcends lineage and genetic landscape, and can be exploited by inhibiting glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) with small-molecules. Using CRISPR screening and lipidomic profiling, we identify the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway as a driver of this vulnerability. In renal CCCs, HIF-2α selectively enriches polyunsaturated lipids, the rate-limiting substrates for lipid peroxidation, by activating the expression of hypoxia-inducible, lipid droplet-associated protein (HILPDA). Our study suggests targeting GPX4 as a therapeutic opportunity in CCCs, and highlights that therapeutic approaches can be identified on the basis of cell states manifested by morphological and metabolic features in hard-to-treat cancers. Clear-cell carcinomas are aggressive tumours characterised by high accumulation of lipids and glycogen. Here, the authors report that these cancers have a common vulnerability to GPX4 inhibition-induced ferroptosis and using CRISPR screen and lipodomic profiling, they identify HIF-2α- HILPDA axis promotes ferroptosis via enrichment of PUFA lipids.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bcc57fb0d4bd3179b8bfa5bc6905f8903dab292b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. D. Tang
  2. R. Kang
  3. Guido Kroemer
  4. Xin Chen
  5. Scott J. Dixon
  6. P. Lei
  7. James A. Olzmann
  8. Qing-zhang Tuo

In Molecular Biology

  1. D. Tang
  2. Guido Kroemer
  3. R. Kang
  4. Xin Chen
  5. D. Klionsky
  6. Jiao Liu
  7. James A. Olzmann
  8. Scott J. Dixon

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

  1. D. Tang
  2. R. Kang
  3. Guido Kroemer
  4. Xin Chen
  5. D. Klionsky
  6. Jiao Liu
  7. James A. Olzmann
  8. Scott J. Dixon

Citations in the corpus