The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, Vol. 1

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Servant leadership and employee outcomes: the moderating role of subordinates’ motives (2016, methodology): “We used a combination of indices—namely, CFI, NNFI (TLI), SRMR and RMSEA—in addition to Chi-square difference tests (Δχ2 (df)) to evaluate the overall fit of the measurement model (Little, 2013).”
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity (2020, result): “The desirable pattern of correlations in a factorial validity assessment is similar to the pattern in discri- minant validity assessment in an MTMM study (Spector, 2013), so in practice the difference between discriminant validity and factorial validity is not as clear-cut.”
Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología (2013, background): “Información más detallada acerca de los métodos cuantitativos en psicología puede encontrarse en el Handbook editado por Little (2013a).”
Gender Differences in Connection to Nature, Outdoor Preferences, and Nature-Based Recreation Among College Students in Brazil and the United States (2020, methodology): “The assumption of homogeneity of variances and the possible influence of outliers were checked before t-tests and regression analyses (Erceg-Hurn et al., 2013).”