We're not friends anymore! unless... : The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression
By Sarah M. Coyne, J. Archer, M. Eslea. 2006
287 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc486079c35cfdb944a51e0ea6b0b270a0a03d86
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Education
In Social Psychology
- Anke Görzig
- Constantinos M. Kokkinos
- Kjartan Ólafsson
- Ioanna Voulgaridou
- Maria Platsidou
- S. O. Salami
- F. Betoret
- Einar M. Skaalvik
Citations in the corpus
- Cyberbullying among Turkish Adolescents (2008, unknown): “19 The early studies on bullying and other studies that followed categorize students involved in bullying into three distinct groups: bullies, bully-vic-tims, and victims.”
- What Makes a Bully a Cyberbully? Unravelling the Characteristics of Cyberbullies across Twenty-Five European Countries (2013, background): “Furthermore, electronic forms of contact provide a platform for verbal threats and insults which represent relational and subtle forms of aggression that have beenmore commonly observed in females (Coyne et al., 2006), in particular on SNS (Smith, 2011, 2012).”
- Relational aggression in adolescents: A review of theoretical and empirical research (2015, background): “recommended to compensate for limitations associated with any single measurement approach (Archer& Coyne, 2005; Coyne et al., 2008; Crick et al., 1999; Doyle & DeFago, 2009; McEvoy et al., 2003; Merrell et al., 2006). Indeed, Crapanzano et al. (2010) have reliably used both peer and self-report meth”