Is There Universality in the Full Range Model of Leadership?

By B. Bass. 2007

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc401d1d1d44ebf15a60f885036afa47db481d93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Syed Awais Ahmed Tipu
2. Gretchen M. Spreitzer
3. James C. Ryan

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Syed Awais Ahmed Tipu
2. Gretchen M. Spreitzer
3. Katherine Xin
4. James C. Ryan
5. Abraham Carmeli
6. Alper Ertürk

In Strategy and Management

1. Syed Awais Ahmed Tipu
2. Gretchen M. Spreitzer
3. Katherine Xin
4. James C. Ryan

Citations in the corpus

• Traditionality matters: An examination of the effectiveness of transformational leadership in the United States and Taiwan. (2005, background): “effective across those with different cultural values. Bass (1991) suggests that leaders who”
• Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model (2013, background): “Though Bass (1996) makes initial claims for a degree of universality in the FRL model, he also recognizes the need to make some adjustments to the paradigm for application in a non-western context.”
• Deficient Critical Thinking Skills among College Graduates: Implications for leadership (2012, background): “Newer theories focus on other concepts such as transformational leadership (Bass, 1996) servant leadership (Greenleaf, 1977) authentic leadership (Avolio & Gardner, 2005) leadership from a sense-making perspective (Weick, 1995), holistic leadership (Quatro et al., 2007), and emotional leadership…”