Shame in Two Cultures: Implications for Evolutionary Approaches

By Daniel M.T. Fessler. 2004

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba5fea818cc78994ae15b2c91e7e0cc2430e750d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Restore and protect motivations following shame (2010, background): “In addition, these theories do not consider the possible activation of approach behaviours (eg, Fessler, 2004 ; Gilbert, 2003 ; Lewis, 1971 ; Tangney, 1991 ; Wurmser, 1987 ).”
Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt (2007, methodology): “It is possible that shame motivates cooperation in the long term, for example by conformity to group norms (see Fessler, 2004). Further empirical research is needed to investigate whether the long-term effects of shame on cooperation are similar to the short-term effects of shame. A third observatio”
Weird people, yes, but also weird experiments (2010, unknown): “In the 21st century, scattered teams of highly interdisciplinary researchers have already begun to demonstrate how to integrate ethnographic and experimental findings in a manner that takes advantage of their synergies, going well beyond “thick description” (e.g., Atran et al. 1999; 2005; Barrett & ”
Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation (2012, background): “Shame is not bound up with harm in the same way as guilt, but it is also a form of self-punishment (Fessler 2004 emphasizes its appeasement function).”
Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010, unknown): “In the 21st century, scattered teams of highly interdisciplinary researchers have already begun to demonstrate how to integrate ethnographic and experimental findings in a manner that takes advantage of their synergies, going well beyond “thick description” (e.g., Atran et al. 1999; 2005; Barrett & ”
From appeasement to conformity: Evolutionary and cultural perspectives on shame, competition, and cooperation. (2007, methodology): “However, results from both California and Bengkulu (Fessler, 2004) indicate that, while defection in a cooperative relationship is central to some shame events, this category is dwarfed by a larger one in which the cultural standard at issue does not concern cooperation.”
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. (2011, unknown): “, & Fiske, A. P. (2004). Watching social interactions produces dorsomedial prefrontal and medial parietal BOLD fMRI signal increases compared to a resting baseline.”
The Many Roles of Control in a Stressor-Emotion Theory of Counterproductive Work Behavior (2006, background): “Cultural factors (such as assumptions about mankind’s control over nature, emotion display rules, social norms, and behavioral expectations) play a role as well in determining the valence, intensity, and other facets of the emotional response (e.g., see Fessler, 2004 on collectivist/individualist ”
Anticipated verbal feedback induces altruistic behavior (2008, background): “10 Fessler (2004) provides extensive references to the literature on shame.”