Human Emotions: A Sociological Theory

By J. Turner. 2007

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba2e73a3f5f717ba36cb44fd572c2248cf169aee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Understanding Airline Travelers’ Perceptions of Well-Being: The Role of Cognition, Emotion, and Sensory Experiences in Airline Lounges (2016, methodology): “● “Emotional evaluation” was measured with seven items adapted from Izard (1977). Respondents were asked to rate their emotional feelings during their stay at the airline lounge.”
Emotions in Tourism: Theoretical Designs, Measurements, Analytics, and Interpretations (2020, methodology): “A categorical approach (e.g., Izard 1977; Plutchik 1980) conceptualizes emotions as a set of idiosyncratic affective states and offers a solution to exploring behavioral consequences of specific emotions.”
Person-Place Congruency (2005, background): “A methodological study on emotions measures has shown that the Izard (1977) and Plutchik (1980) scales “outperform the Mehrabian and Russell” (1974) (i.e., PAD) measure by offering a “richer assessment of emotional responses to the shopping experience” (Machleit and Eroglu 2000, p. 101).”
The Emotions that Drive Viral Video (2013, methodology): “Perhaps important to note here, while rating scales have been used to measure emotional intensity in other studies of viral marketing, using variants of primary emotions to classify intensity is consistent with other research on emotional responses (Cacioppo et al., 2000; Turner, 2007).”
Online Information Seeking and Disease Prevention Intent During COVID-19 Outbreak (2020, background): “83), respondents were asked to indicate how often they felt “anxious, worried or concerned,” “sad, downhearted or unhappy,” “scared, fearful or afraid,” and “angry, irritated or annoyed” when thinking about the novel coronavirus (Izard, 1977).”