Entrepreneurship and the Business Cycle
By Philipp Koellinger, Roy Thurik. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012
415 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9d46245c23fd6ff9d7f0f72d2a43a2e4591eb57
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- David Urbano
- Sebastian Aparicio
- M. Vivarelli
- David B. Audretsch
- J. Hessels
- Tomasz Mickiewicz
- Peter van der Zwan
- Maximilian Goethner
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Tomasz Mickiewicz
- Saul Estrin
- M. Vivarelli
- J. Hessels
- Peter van der Zwan
Citations in the corpus
- Self-employment and work-related stress: The mediating role of job control and job demand (2017, background): “Many governments actively target self-employment (Gilbert et al., 2004; European Commission, 2013) because of its positive link with economic growth (Audretsch and Keilbach, 2004; Carree and Thurik, 2010; Koellinger and Thurik, 2012).”
- Designing a global standardized methodology for measuring social entrepreneurship activity: the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor social entrepreneurship study (2011, neutral): “…extensively in leading news outlets (e.g. Economist, 2007, 2009) and utilized in research published in leading academic journals (Aidis, Estrin, & Mickiewicz, 2008; Bowen & DeClercq, 2008; Koellinger & Thurik, 2012; Kwon & Arenius, 2010; McMullen, Bagby, & Palich, 2008; Stephan & Uhlaner, 2010).”
- Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective (2018, neutral): “However, most of the literature has focused on either entrepreneurship (e.g. Koellinger & Thurik 2012) or institutions (e.g. Fatas & Mihov 2013), with less emphasis on the joint effects of entrepreneurship and institutions on economic growth.”
- Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know? (2016, neutral): “…other hand, as highlighted by theoretical work (Aghion & Howitt, 1992; Schumpeter, 1911), recent empirical studies instead show that entrepreneurial activity affects long-run growth and productivity—that is, the opposite causal association (cf. Bjørnskov & Foss, 2012; Koellinger & Thurik, 2012).”
- Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship (2016, neutral): “See Koellinger and Thurik (2012) for an analysis using this variable establishing its interplay with the business cycle. economic variables and economic growth or productivity development, or its effect is insignificant or negative in the long run.”
- Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-Entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries (2014, neutral): “According to Schumpeter (1934), entrepreneurship is a driving force of innovation and, more generally, an engine for economic development (Audretsch, Keilbach and Lehmann 2006; Koellinger and Thurik 2012; for a comprehensive survey, see Van Praag and Versloot 2007).”
- Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: Measurement and determinants (2019, background): “and enhancing employment opportunities (Koellinger and Thurik, 2012; Fritsch, 2008; Audretsch et al., 2006).”
- Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries (2013, background): “Introduction In recent years, a strong belief that “entrepreneurship” is a crucial driver of economic growth for both developed and developing nations has emerged among both scholars and policy makers (see, for instance, Audretsch et al., 2006; Koellinger and Thurik, 2012; and, for a comprehensive s”
- Size matters: entrepreneurial entry and government (2012, result): “Some ambiguity in these results is resolved by Koellinger and Thurik (2009), who demonstrate that time gaps should be taken into account.”
- To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups (2016, neutral): “On the one hand, according to Schumpeter (1934, 1939), new firms are the driving force of change and, more generally, an engine for economic development (Audretsch et al. 2006; Koellinger and Thurik 2012; for a comprehensive survey, see Van Praag and Versloot 2007).”
- Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? (2019, background): “…countries (Bizri 2017; Collins and Low 2010); and second, the still unstable economic platform of the US, UK, and Europe (Giotopoulos et al. 2017; Koellinger and Thurik 2012; Varvarigos and Gil-Moltó 2016), among other types of crises, create opportunities for entrepreneurship scholars to…”