PRODUCT AND INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AMONG JAPANESE MULTINATIONAL FIRMS

By J. Geringer, Stephen Tallman, David M. Olsen. 2000

634 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9a78e0a53a9e6a9fa0f3e164da407a1187393ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research (2008, background): “Birkinshaw and Morrison (1995) Gomes and Ramaswamy (1999) Evans and Mavondo (2002) g Dussauge and Garrette (1995) Luo and Peng (1999) Kotabe, Srinivasan, and Aulakh (2002) JJ Gencturk and Aulakh (1995) Money and Graham (1999) Nobeoka, Dyer, and Madhok (2002) g Johnson (1995) Myers (1999) Pothukuchi,”
Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: the dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries (2005, methodology): “Finally, we enter a time dummy indicating Japanese firms’ entry prior to 1986 (Geringer et al., 2000).”
International Diversification: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators (2006, neutral): “Other researchers working from this conceptual base have found the interaction term to be nonsignificant (Geringer et al., 2000).”
An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigm (2007, background): “Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) refer to administrative heritage as the organizational philosophy and institutional memory of a firm and claim that it impacts an organization’s outlook on its operational environment.”
The Importance of Social Capital to the Management of Multinational Enterprises: Relational Networks Among Asian and Western Firms (2002, result): “In support of this conclusion, research has shown that firms in keiretsus have a different strategic profile from non-keiretsu firms ( Geringer, Tallman and Olsen, 2000 ).”
Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization (2006, background): “The case of Japanese firms investing heavily in US-based R&D facilities, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, is a case in point ( Geringer, Tallman and Olsen, 2000 ).”
Regional diversification and firm performance (2008, methodology): “Hence a broad regional spread increases managerial constraints and negatively influences cross-border administration costs (Geringer et al., 2000).”
Performance, Internationalization, and Firm-specific Advantages of SMEs in a Newly-Industrialized Economy (2006, methodology): “Previous studies have adopted objective approaches to measure firms’ performance, such as return on assets (ROA) (Delios and Beamish, 1999; Gomes and Ramaswamy, 1999; Grant, 1987; Grant et al., 1988; Hitt et al., 1997; Kim et al., 1989), return on sales (ROS) (Daniels and Bracker, 1989; Geringer et ”
The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance (2007, background): “The first one is firm size (Geringer et al., 2000; Hitt et al., 1997; Tallman & Li, 1996).”