Practicing Safe Computing: A Multimedia Empirical Examination of Home Computer User Security Behavioral Intentions

By Catherine L. Anderson, Ritu Agarwal. MIS Q., 2010

783 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Information Systems, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b89a8b8645e3c2da0b4b86724970398e4390277c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Information Systems

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Understanding Employee Responses to Stressful Information Security Requirements: A Coping Perspective (2014, background): “recent publications summarize the empirical literature on ISP compliance and related security behaviors [3, 62, 70].”
Future directions for behavioral information security research (2013, background): “…the instrument items and their perceptions in cognitive terms, not in the moment of fear occurrence, but rather as a self-assessment of a perspective determined post-stimulus (e.g., Anderson and Agarwal, 2010; Herath and Rao, 2009b; Iﬁnedo, 2012; Johnston and Warkentin, 2010; Liang and Xue, 2010).”
Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition (2014, methodology): “Anderson and Agarwal’s [2] review of the literature in this area indicated that the majority of previous ISSP compliance research was carried out from the perspectives of criminological theories (i.”
Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers' use of social media for transactions (2018, background): “…and trust, current press, government guidelines and literature are highlighting social networking services as the vector of choice for spreading vulnerability exploits (e.g., Anderson & Agarwal, 2010; Dinev, Goo, Hu, & Nam, 2009; Dinev, 2014; Mitra & Ransbotham, 2015; Smith, Dinev, & Xu, 2011).”
An Enhanced Fear Appeal Rhetorical Framework: Leveraging Threats to the Human Asset Through Sanctioning Rhetoric (2015, methodology): “Hence, it has been used simply to understand how individuals perceive an existing threat without concern for a particular behavioral change mechanism (Anderson and Agarwal 2010; Herath and Rao 2009; Lee 2011).”