The Effect of National Culture on the Adoption of Innovations

By Yvonne van Everdingen, Eric Waarts. 2003

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7fc53498f5dbcbf8e8e83fc39f2eee1091984f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The effect of working relationship quality on salesperson performance and job satisfaction: Adaptive selling behavior in Korean automobile sales representatives (2006, background): “While prior research has gauged the effects of national culture on innovation adoption (e.g., Van Everdingen and Waarts, 2003) and marketing decision making (e.g., Kogut and Singh, 1988; Steenkamp et al., 1999), experts note that the manner by which exogenous factors such as national culture affect ”
The effect of market orientation and its components on innovation consequences: a meta-analysis (2008, background): “... of their superiors, which is often innovative in nature, and also quickly pick up innovations adopted by others of similar status (Dwyer et al. 2005 ;V an den Bulte and Stremersch 2004); Long-term orientation that emphasizes a focus on the future and adaptation of traditions to new circumstances”
Culture-Technology Fit: Effects of Cultural Characteristics on the Post-Adoption Beliefs of Mobile Internet Users (2007, background): “For example, people who have strong individualistic tendencies or low uncertainty avoidance tendencies may use high-technology products to perceive themselves as being on the leading edge [80, 87, 92, 99].”
How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries (2010, neutral): “In the case of large power distance, the sharing of information can be constrained by the hierarchy (van Everdingen and Waarts 2003).”
On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Relationship (2014, background): “For collectivistic cultures, van Everdingen and Waarts (2003) argue that innovative products are, if at all, invested in or purchased in a delayed manner due to complicated collective decision making, all of which limits EO’s performance impact.”
Culture, Time Orientation, and Exploratory Buying Behavior (2009, background): “Van Everdingen and Waarts (2003), facing the same problem of small sample size for each of the countries surveyed, proposed a grouping method based on monochronic and polychronic culture.”
Comparing Innovation Capability of Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: Examining the Effects of Organizational Culture and Empowerment (2010, methodology): “…dimensions of Hofstede have been applied in innovation studies explaining national innovativeness (Lynn and Gelb 1996), cross-national consumer innovativeness (Steenkamp, ter Hofstede, and Wedel 1999), and adoption of innovation (Waarts and van Everdingen 2005; Van Everdingen and Waarts 2003).”
Cross-country differences in ICT adoption: A consequence of Culture? (2006, methodology): “The attempts to capture a more realistic notion of human nature to economics have expanded significantly over the last few decades under the realm of behavioural 18 Van Everdingen and Waarts (2003) and Shane (1993) have also arrived at similar conclusions, but not in the context of ICT.”