Coping: pitfalls and promise.
By S. Folkman, J. Moskowitz. Annual Review of Psychology, 2004
3,460 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Health, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7cf1e37b18f8a32759b21faa46f8e5bb4383691
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- M. Tims
- Crystal L. Park
- Ellen A. Skinner
- M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
- Adam M. Grant
- Shelly L. Gable
- Lucy Yardley
In Health
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Crystal L. Park
- Justin M. Berg
- P. Wong
- Mark T. Spence
- Ryan C. Martin
- Eric R. Dahlen
- Lisa M Watson
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- M. Tims
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Daantje Derks
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Marisa Salanova
- Wido G M Oerlemans
- Sabine Sonnentag
Citations in the corpus
- Antecedent-Focused Emotion Regulation, Response Modulation and Well-Being (2009, methodology): “This process-based emotional regulation model has proven useful in both theory development and stimulation of new research avenues (e.g., Demaree et al. 2006; Diener et al. 2006; Egloff et al. 2006; Folkman and Moskowitz 2004; Krompinger et al. 2008; Perbandt 2007).”
- Do social comparison and coping styles play a role in the development of burnout? Cross‐sectional and longitudinal findings (2006, background): “Despite the fact that there is no consensus on how to classify coping styles, many distinct coping inventories have been devised (for reviews see Latack & Havlovic, 1992; Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004).”
- Culture’s Consequences on Coping (2011, background): “Second, this highly individual and intrapersonal stance of the stress-coping literature has led some to criticize the overly “acontextual” nature of the extant stress and coping literature (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004) and its neglect of culture as a fundamental context of coping (Chun et al., 2006).”
- The relationships among commitment to change,coping with change, and turnover intentions (2006, background): “Of course, coping is not always effective and can lead to negative outcomes (for a review, see Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004).”
- Factors That Contribute to the Adjustment of International Students. (2016, background): “Folkman and Moskowitz (2004) defined coping as the thoughts and behaviors used to manage the internal and external demands of situations that are appraised as stressful.”
- Newsfeed native advertising on Facebook: young millennials’ knowledge, pet peeves, reactance and ad avoidance (2019, background): “The coping process is initiated when users appraise that their important goals of using social media are threatened and, thus, they experience negative emotions or reactance (Folkman and Moskowitz 2004; Wehbe et al. 2017).”
- Socioemotional and Behavioral Adjustment Among School-Age Children With Learning Disabilities (2007, background): “As Folkman and Moskowitz (2004) recommended, the concept of coping may not only offer an explanation of individuals’differences in dealing with stressors but also furnish a portal for intervention and treatment programs because it lends itself to cognitive-behavioral intervention.”
- Cognitive Emotion Regulation In the Prediction of Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Anger (2005, methodology): “Both forms of coping are adaptive, and the most beneficial approach appears to depend on the nature of the stressful situation (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004; Ridder & Schreurs, 2001).”
- Perceived Control and the Development of Coping (2010, background): “…of personal and social resources (e.g., perceived control or social support) show diff erent kinds of coping, and how diff erent kinds of coping contribute to aspects of individual physical, psychological, and social functioning (Aldwin, 2007 ; Compas et al., 2001 ; Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004 ).”
- Recognizing Opportunities for Sustainable Development (2011, background): “One way to cope with a perceived threat is to try and eliminate its underlying source (Folkman & Lazarus, 1985; Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004).”
- Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory (2007, methodology): “Cognitive appraisal theory was popularised by Richard Lazarus and colleagues (for example Folkman and Moskowitz, 2004”