Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research

By B. Paterson, S. Thorne, C. Canam, C. Jillings. 2001

597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7c5705db1f2b45cd99fb8649c87bc70de694168

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Leadership and Management

Citations in the corpus

How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective (2006, background): “Many published syntheses of qualitative research have focused on qualitative research only, and specifically exclude synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence (Paterson et al., 2001).”
Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda (2004, methodology): “Paterson et al. (2001) conceived of metasynthesis as the culmination of meta–data analysis (or the study of research findings in a set of primary studies), metamethod (or the study of the methods used in a set of primary studies), and metatheory (or the study of the frames of reference used in a…”
Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research: A Meta-Study (2015, methodology): “Meta-study is a form of research involving the analysis of the theory, methods, and findings of qualitative research and the synthesis of these insights into novel ways of thinking about phenomena (Paterson et al. 2001).”
A meta-study of athletic identity research in sport psychology: Current status and future directions (2016, methodology): “A meta-study method involves examination of qualitative research in terms of theory, methodology, and findings in order to uncover processes associated with knowledge production and to develop new insights to the studied phenomenon (Clarke et al., 2015; Paterson et al., 2001).”
Learning outcomes of teacher professional development activities: a meta-study (2017, methodology): “Paterson et al. (2001) provided an overview of what can be analysed in this phase and how (such as the research questions, how researchers and participants are related, and data collection techniques), but also argued that each meta-method is different.”
A Meta-Study of Black Male Mental Health and Well-Being (2010, methodology): “The approach by Paterson et al. (2001) confers meaning and constructs a more extensive basis for understanding the interpretation of all components of the research process, including theory, research methods, and data.”
The integrative review: updated methodology. (2005, methodology): “METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCH The integrative review: updated methodology Robin Whittemore PhD APRN”
Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential (2011, unknown): “…to bring together data collected, analyzed and interpreted in qualitative, and sometimes also in quantitative and mixed primary level studies (Jensen and Allen 1996; Johnson and Onwuegbuzie 2004; Mays et al. 2001; Paterson et al. 2001; Rice 2008; Sandelowski et al. 1997; Walsh and Downe 2005).”
Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research (2007, background): “…because it allows a large amount of textual data to be stored and coded, and because it allows the researcher to reflect critically on the analysis as it unfolds, while storing individual insights that may be progressively refined as more information is added (see also Paterson et al., 2001).”