The integrative review: updated methodology.

By R. Whittemore, K. Knafl. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2005

8,663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1af41489312a49e94d2e3ce1c58faf3a5bc8ef8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review (2018, methodology): “The integrative review method is an approach that allows for the inclusion of diverse methodologies, and has the potential to allow for diverse primary research methods to inform evidence-based practice (Whittemore & Knafl 2005).”
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “Quality standards differ across various types of reviews (Whittemore and Knafl 2005).”
Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential (2011, methodology): “First of all, we should clearly identify the problem that the review is addressing, and the review purpose (Maxwell 2005; Onwuegbuzie and Leech 2005; Whittemore and Knafl 2005).”
Ten years of value cocreation: An integrative review (2016, methodology): “As Whittemore and Knafl (2005) suggest, we developed an emergent coding approach (Krippendorff, 2012), which we applied to the 181 papers, or 2,884 pages of core text.”
Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (2017, methodology): “Methods Search strategy, inclusion criteria and data extraction The review question was structured using the following elements—Population of interest (P); Intervention (I); Comparisons (C); Outcome (O); and Time frame (T)—namely, the PICOT format (Whittemore and Knafl, 2005).”
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017, methodology): “Whittemore R, Knafl K.”
Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) (2018, background): “com/ labels such as systematic mixed studies reviews,(4) mixed methods research synthesis,(5) and integrative review.(6) The first label refers to combining qualitative, quantitative, and/or mixed methods studies, while the second one can also refer to combining qualitative and quantitative methods ”
What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education (2013, methodology): “For the data analysis, we followed an iterative process of data categorization and comparison, which is also a representative method of integrative reviews (Whittemore & Knafl, 2005).”