Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Elementary Teachers' Learning to Construct High-Quality Mathematics Lesson Plans (2013, unknown): “…and beliefs, orientations, personal identities, and local contexts, influence the ways in which teachers read, interpret, and eventually implement curricula (Drake & Sherin, 2006; Forbes & Davis, 2010; Lloyd, 1999; Pintó, 2005; Remillard, 1999, 2005; Valencia, Place, Martin, & Grossman, 2006).”
Implementation Research (2016, background): “…& Munter, 2013; Strain & Bovey, 2011), while others have turned away from fidelity, to examine innovation adaptation, the reasons for adaptation, and the relationships between adaptation and student outcomes (e.g., Barab & Luehmann, 2003; Fogleman, McNeill, & Krajcik, 2011; Forbes & Davis, 2010).”
Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (2012, background): “For these assignments, the preservice teachers obtained lesson plans from their mentor teacher; these lesson plans were not typically very inquiry oriented (Forbes & Davis, 2010).”