Multinational enterprises and climate change: Exploring institutional failures and embeddedness

By J. Pinkse, Ans Kolk. Journal of International Business Studies, 2011

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7907ee47ef267a575dcdb989fd2b2c7c07ae9ffd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Pete Tashman
2. Valentina Marano
3. Jonathan P. Doh
4. T. Kostova
5. Mona V. Makhija

In Strategy and Management

1. Valentina Marano
2. Pete Tashman
3. Ernesto Freitas
4. J. Mata
5. Jonathan P. Doh
6. T. Kostova
7. Mona V. Makhija
8. Andreas Georg Scherer

Citations in the corpus

• Multinational Enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: What Do We Know and How to Proceed? (2017, unknown): “- MNEs need to find a balance between their institutional embeddedness in home, host and supranational contexts (Pinkse and Kolk, 2012a).”
• The Social Responsibility of International Business: From Ethics and the Environment to CSR and Sustainable Development (2016, unknown): “…further in IB from business risk and strategic management perspectives (e.g. Kolk & Pinkse, 2008, 2012; Romilly, 2007), but there are still many questions concerning the actual influence on competitiveness and MNE interactions in their home, host and international contexts (Pinkse & Kolk, 2012).”
• International business responses to institutional voids (2017, background): “Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that, barring a few exceptions (i.e., Pinkse & Kolk, 2012; Stephan, Uhlaner, & Stride, 2015; Santangelo&Meyer, 2011), scholarship on responses to institutional voids has not been commonly featured in JIBS or other outlets.”
• Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises (2017, background): “This is because, unlike developed country MNEs, EM-MNEs often cannot simply rely on their home-country institutional environments in order to develop templates of appropriate behaviors (Pinkse & Kolk, 2012).”
• Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms (2012, background): “Foreign firms are better able to deal with periods of institutional changes in the host countries (Pinkse & Kolk, 2011), and are in a favorable position to recognize inefficiencies in local institutions.”