Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK
By K. Lucas. 2006
280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Transportation, Urban Studies
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6932307a4a37e8e266ddc18d27cfb75b97ce7c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ahmed El-Geneidy
- Karel Martens
- A. Golub
- Eda Beyazıt
- K. Lucas
- Tan Yigitcanlar
- Kamruzzaman
- Mohd Afzan Bin Mohamed
In Transportation
- Ahmed El-Geneidy
- Bert van Wee
- Eda Beyazıt
- A. Golub
- Karel Martens
- K. Lucas
- Tan Yigitcanlar
- Kamruzzaman
In Urban Studies
- Karel Martens
- Eda Beyazıt
- Kamruzzaman
- Mohd Afzan Bin Mohamed
- Jay Yang
- Tan Yigitcanlar
- A. Golub
- Otto Anker Nielsen
Citations in the corpus
- Making the connections between transport disadvantage and the social exclusion of low income populations in the Tshwane Region of South Africa (2011, background): “To date, the majority of studies of transport and social exclusion have been conducted within a UK context (e.g. Church et al., 1999; TRaC, 2000; Lucas et al., 2001; Social Exclusion Unit, 2003; Lucas, 2006; Preston and Rajé, 2007; Mackett et al., 2008).”
- Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? (2012, unknown): “…only in the UK (e.g. Kenyon, 2003; Kenyon et al, 2003; Hine and Mitchell, 2003; Hine and Greico, 2003; Hodgson and Turner, 2003; Raje, 2003; 2004; Lucas, 2004a; 2004b; 2006; McDonagh, 2004; Cass et al, 2005; Preston and Raje, 2007; Farrington, 2007; Britow et al, 2008; Lucas et al, 2008; Mackett…”
- Measures of transport-related social exclusion: A critical review of the literature (2016, methodology): “In addition, although the process-oriented measures are useful in evaluating the performance of transport and/or land use systems [103], they provide very little information about the effectiveness of policy options in terms of improving participation in activities—the outcome [21,88].”
- Toward Equitable Transit: Examining Transit Accessibilityand Social Need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006 (2013, background): “…of new transit infrastructure have been well established: better quality of life (Michalos and Zumbo, 1999), environmental, health, and activity patterns (Wilkinson and Marmot, 2003), and greater accessibility and social inclusion, particularly for those without a car (Grengs, 2001; Lucas, 2006).”
- A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States (2012, background): “The availability or un-availability of access shapes people‟s life opportunities (Lucas, 2006) – it determines whether a person can take advantage of education and health services, can access job markets (Ihlanfeldt and Sjoquist, 1998; Ong and Blumenberg, 1998) and thus advance economically, can…”
- Basing Transport Planning on Principles of Social Justice (2011, unknown): “initiative to institutionalize accessibility planning (Lucas 2006).”
- Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to be Learned from the Capability Approach (2011, background): “Among those, social exclusion analysis can be counted (Church et al., 2000; Lucas et al., 2001; Sánchez et al., 2003; Social Exclusion Unit, 2003; Rajé et al., 2004; Lucas, 2005; Hine, 2008).”
- The equity impacts of bus rapid transit: A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport (2018, background): “The work of Eduardo Vasconcellos (2001) on urban transport and equity auditing in developing countries, Karen Lucas (Lucas, 2006; Lucas, Marsden, Brooks, & Kimble, 2008), on transport disadvantage and social inclusion, and Karel Martens and Aaron Golub (Golub & Martens, 2014; Martens & Golub, 2012) ”
- The relationship between norms, satisfaction and public transport use: A comparison across six European cities using structural equation modelling (2019, background): “However, public transport also serves other purposes such as ensuring mobility for all communities in society (Lucas, 2006; Welch and Mishra, 2013), reducing congestion in metropolitan areas (Eboli and Mazzulla, 2015), and ensuring sustainable transport with less environmental impacts (Mees, 2000).”
- Social Impacts of Transport: Literature Review and the State of the Practice of Transport Appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (2009, background): “Lucas ( 2006 ) states that, for children, one of the biggest social changes in the last 50 years in the UK has been their parent’s unwillingness to allow them to be alone outside, unsupervised, for fear of accidents or assaults.”
- Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport (2010, background): “In the UK, a study by the Social Exclusion Unit in 2003 ‘collated a wide-body of research evidence to demonstrate that transport and land-use policies in the UK have interactively worked to systematically create and reinforce social exclusion’ (Lucas, 2006, p. 802).”
- Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans (2014, background): “In modern urban settlements where important land uses and residences are dispersed in space, a lack of transportation can mean a lack of opportunities for work, school, recreation, and social interaction, profoundly impacting the prospects for communities and individuals (Ong and Blumenberg, 1998; I”