Basing Transport Planning on Principles of Social Justice

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding the role of equity in active transportation planning in the United States (2017, background): “Shifting from a time-savings approach to one that favours accessibility gains would better describe the true costs and benefits of transportation projects (Martens, 2013) and help highlight transportation inequities for non-motorised travellers.”
Discussing Equity and Social Exclusion in Accessibility Evaluations (2011, background): “…in the literature relate do the equity aspects of using income-dependent Values of Time (e.g. Grant-Muller et al., 2001 Mackie et al., 2003, Martens, 2006), the distribution effects of public transport policies (e.g. Bureau and Glachant, 2011), the spatial equity of transport…”
A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States (2012, background): “effect that the most mobile who make greater demands on the road network will be the beneficiaries of future investments because of the congestion they cause (Martens, 2006).”
Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to be Learned from the Capability Approach (2011, background): “Traditional approaches in transport modelling are based on demand and activities, but not on the actual needs of the society (Martens, 2006).”