Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: Some Recent Developments
By Daniel McFadden. 1977
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Martin D. Smith
- Junyi Shen
- Panagiotis Adamopoulos
- A. Gregory
- J. Wilen
- Francis L. Huang
- Yolanda Anyon
- E. Greer
Citations in the corpus
- What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses (2013, background): “2139 , which represents a very good fit for an ordered choice model ( McFadden 1978 ) .”
- Disaggregate Behavioral Travel Demand's RUM Side A 30-Year Retrospective (2000, methodology): “Table 4, taken from McFadden (1978), summarizes the results.”
- An Examination of Restorative Interventions and Racial Equity in Out-of-School Suspensions (2018, methodology): “Pseudo R2s for logistic regression models are typically lower when compared to traditional R2s for linear regression models and for McFadden’s R2; values between .20 and .40 represent an excellent fit (McFadden, 1977).”
- Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior (2003, background): “First, it suggests that the model is globally consistent with stochastic utility maximization [6, 15 ].”
- How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model (2004, unknown): “Also see McFadden (1979).”
- Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data (2009, methodology): “The prediction success indices suggested by McFadden ( 1979 ) are calculated and summarized in Table 8 .”