Closure and divestiture by foreign entrants: the impact of entry and post‐entry strategies

By J. Mata, Pedro Portugal. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b552bdcdcff78b238ab25bef6d788189cb585319

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. René Belderbos
2. Jianglei Zou
3. J. Mata
4. Laszlo Tihanyi
5. A. Swaminathan
6. S. Soule
7. Ernesto Freitas
8. M. Brauer

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jianglei Zou
2. J. Mata
3. René Belderbos
4. Ernesto Freitas
5. Laszlo Tihanyi
6. A. Swaminathan
7. S. Soule
8. M. Brauer

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. René Belderbos
2. Jianglei Zou
3. S. Soule
4. A. Swaminathan
5. Laszlo Tihanyi
6. M. Brauer
7. J. Mata
8. Pedro Portugal

Citations in the corpus

• Introduction: The internationalization of Chinese and Indian firms: trends, motivations and strategy (2009, background): “However, a study by Mata and Portugal (2000) of the closure and divestment of 1000 foreign-owned firms that started operating in Portugal during the period 1983-1989 shows that the mode of entry – greenfield vs. acquisition – affects the longevity of the investment.”
• Real options and foreign affiliate divestments: A portfolio perspective (2009, background): “1 Contributions to the literature on survival of foreign affiliates include Boddewyn (1979), Li (1995), Shaver (1998), Shaver et al (1997), Zaheer and Mosakowski (1997), Delios and Beamish (2001), Mata and Portugal (2000), Pennings and Sleuwaegen (2000).”
• Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms (2012, background): “An earlier study by Mata and Portugal (2000) examined the survival of newly established domestic and foreign firms in Portugal.”
• Caught in the crossfire: Dimensions of vulnerability and foreign multinationals' exit from war‐afflicted countries (2017, unknown): “Since greenfield investments are less likely to be divested (Mata and Portugal, 2000), we controlled for greenfield as 1 for greenfield entry and 0 otherwise.”
• Foreign investment, divestment and relocation by Japanese electronics firms in East Asia (2006, background): “FOREIGN INVESTMENT, DIVESTMENT AND RELOCATION 27 Mata, J. and P. Portugal, 2000, Closure and divestiture by foreign entrants: The impact of entry and post-entry strategies.”
• The diffusion of foreign divestment from Burma (2014, methodology): “…and Zaheer (2005). the firms’ international operations (Benito, 1997; Berry, 2013; Lee and Caves, 1998; Li, 1995; Mariotti and Piscitello, 1999; Mata and Portugal, 2000).8 Based on this literature, the analysis below includes measures of firm size, firm performance, and firm scope of…”
• What Have We Acquired and What Should We Acquire in Divestiture Research? A Review and Research Agenda (2006, background): “Similarly, Mata and Portugal (2000) qualified earlier results by finding that ownership structures affect the likelihood of divestiture but not of closure.”
• The survival of new domestic and foreign‐owned firms (2002, background): “We are able to distinguish greenfield and acquisition entrants for foreign entrants and we analyze entry and exit modes elsewhere (Mata and Portugal 2000).”