The survival of new domestic and foreign‐owned firms

By J. Mata, Pedro Portugal. 2002

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc160935f586c380980787f0e0e8d8b18132c799

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Lilach Nachum
2. René Belderbos
3. Jianglei Zou
4. J. Mata
5. Ernesto Freitas
6. R. Baptista
7. Srilata Zaheer
8. Francisco Lima

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jianglei Zou
2. J. Mata
3. Ernesto Freitas
4. Lilach Nachum
5. R. Baptista
6. René Belderbos
7. Srilata Zaheer
8. Francisco Lima

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Lilach Nachum
2. R. Baptista
3. Srilata Zaheer
4. Francisco Lima
5. A. Amaral
6. René Belderbos
7. Jianglei Zou
8. Shaker A. Zahra

Citations in the corpus

• Firm exit after distress: differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A (2011, neutral): “With parent relationships and cross-participations with related firms, subsidiaries may use their networks to locate potential buyers within or outside the group structure (Dewaelheyns and van Hulle 2009; Mata and Portugal 2002).”
• An analysis of new firm survival using a hazard function (2010, background): “…on the post-entry performance of new firms (see, for example, Mata and Portugal, 1994; Audretsch and Mahmood, 1995; Arrighetti and Vivarelli, 1999; Mata and Portugal, 2002).1 However, while much attention has been given to factors affecting the birth and death of firms in the UK, and to the…”
• Linking HR formality with employee job quality: The role of firm and workplace size (2010, background): “Such enterprises are much more likely to cease trading than larger enterprises (Mata & Portugal, 2002) primarily because they lack control over their external environment.”
• When Is Foreignness an Asset or a Liability? Explaining the Performance Differential Between Foreign and Local Firms (2010, background): “…Parkhe, 2002; Zaheer, 1995; Zaheer & Mosakowski, 1997), those that find the opposite to be the case (Kronborg & Thomsen, 2009; Li & Guisinger, 1991; Nachum, 2003), and yet others that illustrate that there are no performance differences between these firms (Jungnickel, 2002; Mata & Portugal, 2002).”
• The survival of international new ventures (2007, background): “Recent research proposes that foreign and domestic firms do not differ in their survival probabilities after controlling for industry and firm characteristics (Mata and Portugal, 2002).”
• The impact of human capital on the early success of necessity versus opportunity-based entrepreneurs (2014, background): “Mata and Portugal (2002) argue that the level of the formal education held by a firm’s workforce can be regarded as a measure, albeit imperfect, of firm-specific resources and capabilities.”
• Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms (2012, background): “In another study, Mata and Portugal (2002) followed a sample of new firms over their first years and found that foreign firms were indeed more likely to survive, but once a relatively small number of characteristics that were different between foreign and domestic firms were accounted for, foreign…”
• The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment (2005, methodology): “The analytical methodology wherein regression coefficients are compared across two models has been utilized extensively in prior research to compare between two groups of firms or industries (e.g., Dean, Brown, and Bamford, 1998; Mata and Portugal, 2002).”
• Serial entrepreneurship: impact of human capital on time to re-entry (2011, methodology): “We reach a similar conclusion to Mata and Portugal (2002) that, within the Portuguese private sector, \1% of the total dissolutions are due to merger.”