The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context
By David Banks. 2008
100 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b483536415fa0f188b3cd5a1fcb41f9c3e071e55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Feng Kevin Jiang
- Ken Hyland
- Ahmad Ansarifar
- Hesamoddin Shahriari
- R. Pishghadam
- Douglas Biber
- Raffaella Negretti
- A. Molino
Citations in the corpus
- “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018, background): “Authors such as Atkinson (1999), Banks (2008), Bazerman (1988), Valle (1999) and Salager-Meyer, (1999) have all made important contributions to this endeavour, revealing significant changes in the apparently frozen textual surfaces of (usually) scientific research articles.”
- Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics (2018, background): “” Scientific prose has been singled out for its dense use of nominalizations (Banks, 2008; Halliday &Martin, 1993; Halliday, 1979; Ni, 2003). This involves the transformation of verbs into nouns through processes such as the addition of derivational suffixes or the use of noun equivalents (Halliday ”