Goal progress makes one happy, or does it? Longitudinal findings from the work domain

By B. Wiese, Alexander Freund. 2005

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4391f380d81abd8e79f12fc047c874de10350e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Edwin A. Locke
2. Gary P. Latham
3. Adam M. Grant
4. Andrew J. Martin
5. T. Brown
6. Patrick Kampkötter
7. J. Caillier
8. A. Hirschi

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Gary P. Latham
2. Edwin A. Locke
3. Adam M. Grant
4. J. Caillier
5. George A. Shinkle
6. Robert A. Baron
7. Malin E. Brännback
8. A. Carsrud

In Social Psychology

1. Edwin A. Locke
2. Gary P. Latham
3. Adam M. Grant
4. T. Judge
5. J. Caillier
6. A. Bandura
7. George A. Shinkle
8. Andrew J. Martin

Citations in the corpus

• New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. (2007, result): “Consistent with goal-setting theory, which posits that higher goals lead to higher satisfaction than lower goals, Wiese and Freund (2005), in a study conducted in Germany, found that only those people who perceived that their goal had been difficult to attain reported a significant increase in…”
• New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory (2006, background): “Evidently, success in one realm compensated for failure in the other (Wiese & Freund, 2005).”