Is there persistence in innovative activities

By Elena Cefis. 2003

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b412b40810bd481af9af2eb68944f32b90608d8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Science Parks’ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model (2008, background): “event-dependent phenomenon. In this way it accounts for the persistency of innovative activities ( Cefis 2003 ) and the cumulativeness of knowledge.”
Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries (2011, background): “Cefis and Marsili (2007) show that innovation plays”
Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants (2006, background): “Where monopoly power is achieved, this is only temporary as ‘the relevant knowledge base is easily available, [and] new innovators systematically substitute for incumbents’ ( Cefis, 2003, p. 490 ).”
‘Better late than never’: the interplay between green technology and age for firm growth (2017, background): “In these cases, partial support for the presence of persistence emerges when considering top innovators (Geroski et al. 1997; Cefis 2003).”
Inside Innovation Persistence: New Evidence From Italian Micro-Data (2012, unknown): “Following Cefis (2003) it is possible to model the sequence of innovation and noninnovation states as a stochastic process approximated by a two-state Markov chain with transition probabilities:”
Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis (2010, unknown): “Cefis (2003) finds that persistence in innovation is characteristic of major innovators.”
Internal and external factors in innovation persistence (2013, methodology): “The empirical tests will develop the transition probability matrix (TPM) methodology implemented by many authors, such as Cefis and Orsenigo (2001), Cefis (2003), Peters (2009), David and Rullani (2008) and Antonelli, Crespi, and Scellato (2012).”
Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes (2009, background): “In several studies firms that are identified as innovators tend to be more profitable than other firms: see Geroski, Machin and van Reenen (1993), Cefis (2003a), Cefis and Ciccarelli (2005), Roberts (1999), Dosi (2007), among others.”
Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence (2009, methodology): “Cefis (1999, 2003) used a UK sub–sample of the data set of Malerba and Orsenigo (1999) and applied a non–parametric approach based on transition probabilities matrices.”
Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms' Survival (2006, background): “The idea is to describe the evolution of these distributions over time, which will allow us to analyse intra-distribution mobility of firms supplying the information about the firm’s relative situation and its movement over time (Cefis, 2003).”