Survivor: The Role of Innovation in Firms' Survival

By Elena Cefis, Orietta Marsili. 2006

615 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fc02f7b0855c72bb8f5bd4148aae6201031dfef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit (2014, neutral): “…firm level determinants of exit (e.g. Balcaen et al., 2012; Ghemawat and Nalebuff, 1985), the relationship between funding and exit (e.g. Cumming, 2008), the relationship between innovation and exit (e.g. Cefis and Marsili, 2006) and the human capital factors leading to exit (e.g. Van Praag, 2003).”
Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, positive): “In addition, the chances of survival could manifest through productivity changes that could be borne out of increased innovation in which the firm engages in (Cefis and Marsili, 2006).”
The Relationship between Technology, Innovation, and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence on E-Business in Europe (2008, result): “Various empirical studies are consistent with this message (Audretsch, 1995; Cefis and Marsili, 2003; Mansfield, 1968).”
Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK (2005, background): “…increases a firm’s export potential (Bleaney and Wakelin, 2002), profits over long periods and during recessions (Geroski et al., 1993), credit ratings (Czarnitzki and Kraft, 2004), chances of surviving in the market (Cefis and Marsili, 2004) and market value (Hall, 2000; Toivanen et al., 2002).”
Firm exit after distress: differentiating between bankruptcy, voluntary liquidation and M&A (2011, positive): “…Bhattacharjee et al. 2009; Buehler et al. 2006), compare exiting firms with healthy firms that survive (for example, Schary 1991; Köke 2002; Cefis and Marsili 2006), or focus on exit of entrepreneurial firms (for example, Harhoff et al. 1998; Leroy et al. 2010; Prantl 2003; Wennberg et…”
Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model (2014, background): “Innovation is a key driver of economic development and plays a crucial role in competition at both the national and firm levels (Cefis & Marsili, 2006; Tellis, Prabhu, & Chandy, 2009).”
THE ELIXIR (OR BURDEN) OF YOUTH? EXPLORING DIFFERENCES IN INNOVATION BETWEEN START-UPS AND ESTABLISHED FIRMS. (2008, background): “Indeed, Cefis and Marsili (2005; 2006) found that by being innovative, firms can greatly increase their chances of survival, suggesting that, for start-ups, innovation may be a matter of life or death.”
Size, strategic, and market orientation affects on innovation (2008, background): “Thus the contention is that small firms that innovate successfully would increase their chances of survival and growth (Cefis and Marsili, 2003; De Jong et al., 2004).”
Barriers to innovation and public policy in Catalonia (2008, positive): “The main reason is that when new firms overcome barriers to innovation, they usually increase their chances of survival and growth potential (Cefis and Marsili, 2006).”