Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis
By Jacques Mairesse, Pierre Mohnen. 2010
641 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b07540afd80a1956ef2b47cd2cf80f7aace2574
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Sandro Montresor
- Giulio Cainelli
- D. Antonioli
- M. Mazzanti
- Pierre Mohnen
- Bronwyn H Hall
- Jacques Poot
- Peter Nijkamp
Citations in the corpus
- Diversity is strategy: the effect of R&D team diversity on innovative performance (2017, positive): “Secondly, PITEC is designed as a panel data survey so we overcome estimation problems related to the simultaneity between innovation inputs and outputs, by lagging independent variables (Mairesse and Mohnen, 2010).”
- THE INNOVATION†EMPLOYMENT NEXUS: A CRITICAL SURVEY OF THEORY AND EMPIRICS (2016, neutral): “Furthermore, they often do not include comprehensive information on firm characteristics, suffer from selection problems depending on specific sample representativeness and generally focus only on continuing businesses (see Mairesse and Mohnen, 2010 for further discussion).”
- Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industries: The case of an emerging economy (2017, background): “…The case of an emerging..., Industrial Marketing Management (2 of innovation and business performance (Cohen, 2010; Geldes & Felzensztein, 2013; Mairesse & Mohnen, 2010; Mothe & Nguyen, 2012), such as: firm sales (log), number of patents, cooperation with other firms, belonging to a group of…”
- Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data (2013, background): “R&D) that cannot fully capture innovation efforts (Mairesse & Mohnen, 2010) or prevent the differentiation of various types of innovation (product/process), despite their potentially varying effects on performance (Bocquet, 2011).”
- CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis (2015, methodology): “Asmentioned previously, we adopt an evolutionary perspective, in the belief that the probability of innovation depends on a mix of firm-specific characteristics and sector configurations (Mairesse and Mohnen 2010; Teece 1986).”
- Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, methodology): “…standard one in the 12 For brevity, we do not comment on other descriptive statistics and refer to the extensive presented tables which offer detailed insights by sector and size. literature on innovation–cooperation and takes stock of the several works based on CIS data (Mairesse & Mohnen, 2010).”
- The Risks of Innovation: Are Innovating Firms Less Likely to Die? (2012, neutral): “This is a clear advantage relative to previous studies that mostly use measures of innovation based on subjective perceptions of managers for a cross-section of firms taken from innovation surveys (Mairesse & Mohnen, 2010).”
- Service innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from Spain (2012, methodology): “This study, then, is constructed on widely accepted innovation indicators and variables (for a review of CIS-based studies, see van Beers et al., 2008; Mairesse and Mohnen, 2010).”
- Is environmental innovation embedded within high-performance organisational changes? The role of human resource management and complementarity in green business strategies (2013, result): “We thus assure potential comparability of results with CIS studies (see Horbach et al., 2012 for a recent analysis on Germany).8 CIS based studies surveyed by Mairesse and Mohnen highlight how issues regarding environmental innovation have recently made their appearance (Mairesse and Mohnen, 2010).”