The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From Excess Commuting to Commuting Possibilities: More Extension to the Concept of Excess Commuting (2007, background): “However, although the links between urban form and commuting have been investigated many times (Horner, 2004), the association remains uncertain (Giuliano and Small, 1993; Levine, 1998; Schwanen et al, 2002; 2004; Weber and Kwan, 2003).”
Urban Polycentricity and the Costs of Commuting: Evidence from Italian Metropolitan Areas (2010, unknown): “2004; Levinson and Kumar, 1994; Naess, 2007). Schwanen et al. (2004) , in an analysis”
The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips (2006, unknown): “…its interaction with gender, or educational attainment on mode choice decisions for medium-and longer-distance travel, these factors are incorporated in the empirical analysis, because they are important determinants of mode choice for daily trips in the Netherlands (Schwanen et al., 2004).”
Job Accessibility as an Indicator of Auto-Oriented Urban Structure: A Comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo (2006, background): “Numerous authors discuss the linkage between urban spatial structure and travel behavior, and ultimately sustainability (see, for example, Geurs and Ritsema van Eck, 2003; Kaidou, 2001; Kwok and Yeh, 2000; Schwanen et al, 2004).”