Critical Incident Stress Management and Critical Incident Stress debriefings: evolutions, effects and outcomes

By J. Mitchell, G. Everly. 2000

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2d89afaf10b1b52d9109de095a2f613b6f1e7b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Paul T. Bartone
2. Peter Cotton
3. G. Devilly
4. R. Gist
5. W. Shen
6. S. Maddi

In Emergency Medical Services

1. Paul T. Bartone
2. Peter Cotton
3. G. Devilly
4. R. Gist

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul T. Bartone
2. Peter Cotton
3. G. Devilly
4. T. Britt
5. R. Gist
6. W. Shen

Citations in the corpus

• How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience? (2016, background): “Two interventions that have been targeted to these groups of employees are Psychological First Aid (PFA; Everly & Flynn, 2006) and Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM; Mitchell & Everly, 2000).”
• Resilience Under Military Operational Stress: Can Leaders Influence Hardiness? (2006, background): “…now seems even more important, given the generally recognized failure of postdisaster psychological interventions such as critical incident stress debriefing (Mitchell & Everly, 2000) to make any positive difference for those receiving them (van Emmerik, Kamphuis, Hulsbosch, & Emmelkamp, 2002).”
• Ready! Fire! Aim! The Status of Psychological Debriefing and Therapeutic Interventions: In the Work Place and after Disasters (2006, methodology): “Most debriefing interventions have been modeled on the seven-phase CISD process described by Mitchell (1983; Mitchell & Everly, 2000).”