Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question Formats

By J. Deshazo. 2002

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2b1d07c31d15d2f3e000ec862c31e537ced4682

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation (2001, background): “DeShazo (2000) offers a prospect theory explanation involving loss-aversion and framing on the first price.”
Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe (2011, background): “, 2008, forthcoming) with commentators arguing that framing effects have to be addressed within the design of studies (DeShazo, 2002; Bateman et al., 2009).”
Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach (2005, background): “An alternative theoretical framework is proposed by DeShazo (2002).”
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies (2012, background): “behavior appears to change when the valuation questions are simply presented in a different order? While order effects in simpler SP formats have been studied in detail [27,21,18,6], it is only comparatively recently that DCEs have come under the same scrutiny [13,29,36,19].”
Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions (2005, methodology): “DeShazo (2002) used this idea to examine responses to double-bounded WTP questions, and concluded that people form reference points when they respond "yes" to the first WTP question in the doublebounded format.”
The Economic Value of Water Quality (2008, unknown): “5 See also DeShazo (2002), and more generally, Louviere (1988) and Louviere et al.”
The diffusion of microgeneration technologies – assessing the influence of perceived product characteristics on home owners' willingness to pay (2011, background): “However, the assumption that responses to the two bids follow the same true underlying valuation was questioned by Cameron and Quiggin (1994, p. 219) and empirical tests show that this assumption is in fact regularly violated (e.g. Aprahamian et al., 2007; DeShazo, 2002; Ready et al., 1996).”
Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness (2008, result): “A number of studies report such results [7, 14, 23, 41], typical of which are the findings of McFadden [41] which “reject at the 1% level the hypothesis that first and second responses in the double referendum experiment are drawn from the same distribution” (pp705-706).”