Dynamic Learning and Context-Dependence in Sequential, Attribute-Based, Stated-Preference Valuation Questions

By T. Holmes, Kevin J. Boyle. Land Economics, 2005

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bbc104b4a57e146c01b377f165bb77bde58e3d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Energy Efficiency Investments in the Home: Swiss Homeowners and Expectations about Future Energy Prices (2013, background): “…questions, earlier research has examined whether responses are subject to order effects (Ladenburg and Boye Olsen, 2008), exhibit serial correlation (Holmes and Boyle, 2005), and whether heteroskedasticity arises because of choice task complexity (captured by the number of alternatives in the…”
Choice Certainty and Consistency in Repeated Choice Experiments (2010, background): “Obtaining estimates for the scale parameter therefore provides more insight into preference refinement during a choice sequence (Holmes and Boyle 2005).”
How Much is Too Much? (2008, background): “Thus, contrary to Holmes and Boyle (2005) , we find no effect of context dependence, although this is an important issue that needs to be further investigated.”
Not bored yet – revisiting respondent fatigue in stated choice experiments (2012, background): “Holmes and Boyle (2005) look at an experiment with four choice tasks and find higher scale for the fourth task than for the first task.”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…they occur, and implications for welfare estimation (e.g., Boyle, Bishop, and Welsh 1993; Carson and Mitchell 1995; Bateman and Langford 1997; Carson, Flores, and Hanemann 1998; Holmes and Boyle 2005; Day and Prades 2010; Bech, Kjaer, and Lauridsen 2011; Day et al. 2012; Craig et al. 2015).”
The first time is the hardest: A test of ordering effects in choice experiments (2012, methodology): “While these results are in line with some previous studies looking at the stability of preferences (e.g., Holmes and Boyle 2005, Day et al. 2012), they are in contrast to others (e.g., Carlsson and Martinsson 2001, Hanley et al. 2002).”
The value of familiarity: Effects of knowledge and objective signals on willingness to pay for a public good (2014, result): “11 We wish to clearly distinguish our approach to the “preference refinement” literature (Swait and Adamowicz, 2001, Holmes and Boyle 2005, Brown et. al.”
Uncertainty and risk in wildland fire management: a review. (2011, background): “…with multiple, conflicting criteria, in turn limiting their ability to accurately articulate preferences (Ariely, 2009; Brown et al., 2008; Reiskamp et al., 2006; Braga and Starmer, 2005; Holmes and Boyle, 2005; Maguire and Albright, 2005; DeShazo and Fermo, 2002; Samuelson and Zeckhauser, 1988).”