Multiple Board Appointments and Firm Performance in Emerging Economies: Evidence from India ∗

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence (2020, background): “However, both Ferris et al. (2003) and Sarkar and Sarkar (2009) have reported positive stock market reactions with regards to the appointment of directors with multiple directorships.”
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?” (2012, unknown): “Again, this variable might well affect ROE (positively due to further board member’ experience; Sarkar and Sarkar 2009, or negatively because of time constraints; Fich and Shivdasani 2006) and it might also relate to gender diversity (Farrell and Hersch 2005, p. 87).”
Firm ownership and board characteristics: Do they matter for corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies? (2015, methodology): “We collected the financial and ownership data from the Prowess database created by the Center for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE) which has been commonly utilised in previous studies on Indian corporate sector (Khanna and Palepu, 2000; Sarkar and Sarkar, 2009; Bhaumik and Selarka, 2012).”
Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis (2012, unknown): “Representative measures: ROE, ROA, ROI, ROCE, EPS, and profit margin (Sarkar & Sarkar, 2009; Singh & Gaur, 2009).”