It’s Lovely at the Top: Hierarchical Levels, Identities, and Perceptions of Organizational Ethics

By Linda Klebe Treviño, Gary R. Weaver, Michael E. Brown. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2008

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1f9bfebcc062e42080911e096fc4abe9745129e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Hogg
2. M. Verkuyten

In Information Systems and Management

1. M. Hogg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Hogg
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. David de Cremer
4. Barbara van Knippenberg
5. David E. Rast
6. R. Crisp
7. S. Giessner
8. Viviane Seyranian

Citations in the corpus

• Uncertain Self in a Changing World: A Foundation for Radicalisation, Populism, and Autocratic Leadership (2020, background): “Means not sharing a superscript differ significantly as a simple main effect. are isolated by their status from the group as a whole (e.g. Treviño et al., 2008), and can all too easily become autocratic despots who live in fear of “palace coups” to topple them (Moghaddam, 2013).”