BANK SUPERVISION AND REGULATION: WHAT WORKS BEST?

By James R. Barth, G. Caprio, Ross Levine. 2004

293 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b080880cb77fc89ae12dfed53f21fb226e8ae9e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance (2006, unknown): “Barth, Caprio, and Levine 2004, Berger, Hasan, and Klapper 2004).”
Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship (2006, unknown): “(Barth et al. (2004) discuss financial sector regulations across countries).”
Bank Competition and Financial Stability : Friends or Foes? (2008, background): “While foreign bank entry is mostly positively related to banking system stability, government ownership has mostly a negative impact on both competitiveness of the banking system and its stability (Barth, Caprio, and Levine, 2004; Caprio and Martinez Peria, 2002).”
The Determinants of Commercial Bank Interest Margin and Profitability: Evidence from Tunisia (2005, unknown): “In their recent work Barth et al. (2004) claim that government ownership of banks is negatively related to bank efficiency.”
Determinants of Bank Profitability: Macroeconomic Evidence from Nigeria (2008, unknown): “17 test is used to support using the linear function, it is evident that the linear functional form is widely used in the literature and produces good results (Bourke, 1989 and Bashir, 2000). The majority of studies on bank profitability, such as Short (1979), Bourke (1989), Molyneux and Thornton (1”
The New Comparative Economics (2003, background): “It appears that at least a significant portion of institutional variation is systematic, and the factor that shapes many of national institutions is the origin of a country’s laws.”
Bank ownership type and banking relationships (2006, unknown): “and Shleifer 2002, Barth, Caprio, and Levine 2004, Beck, Demirguc-Kunt, and Maksimovic 2004,”
What Explains the Low Profitability of Chinese Banks (2009, unknown): “(2002), and Barth et al. (2004)]. For the specific case of China, several papers have shed some light on the effects of property structure. Yao and Jiang (2007) show that state-owned banks were 8-18% less efficient than non state-owned banks.”
Cash dividend policy, corporate pyramids, and ownership structure: Evidence from China (2013, background): “Barth et al. (2004) conclude that more than 98% of the banking assets in China are owned and controlled by the state.”
Bank Supervision and Corruption in Lending (2006, methodology): “6 The mean is not exactly equal to zero because we use the raw data from Barth et al. (2004) on the supervisory indicators.”
The economic value of regulated disclosure: Evidence from the banking sector (2006, methodology): “This is consistent with earlier findings (Barth et al., 2004) and Beck et al.”
Bank Governance, Regulation, and Risk Taking (2009, unknown): “Furthermore, activity restrictions might reduce the ability of banks to diversify income flows (Barth, Caprio, and Levine, 2004).”
Bank Financing for SMEs: Evidence Across Countries and Bank Ownership Types (2009, background): “2004) and large shares of government bank ownership are typically associated with unfavorable macroeconomic consequences and less developed financial and economic systems (e.g., La Porta et al. 2002; Barth et al. 2004; Berger et al. 2004).”
Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability (2008, background): “The data sources are presented in the Appendix.”
What Works in Securities Laws (2006, unknown): “Barth et al. (2003) make an empirical case for the benefits of government regulation of banking.”