Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship
By L. Klapper, Luc Laeven, Raghuram G. Rajan. 2006
1,753 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d0b23dbb25f3706b54859728f416d6b628f66df
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- David B. Audretsch
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
- Thorsten Beck
- Maksim Belitski
- David Urbano
- Saul Estrin
- Tomasz Mickiewicz
- Ross Levine
In Economics and Econometrics
- David B. Audretsch
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
- Thorsten Beck
- David Urbano
- Zoltan J. Acs
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Maksim Belitski
- W. Naudé
Citations in the corpus
- Do Entry Regulations Deter Entrepreneurship and Job Creation? Evidence from Recent Reforms in Portugal (2014, positive): “Previous empirical work has suggested that entry regulation results in increased firm size (Desai et al. , 2003; Klapper et al. , 2006; Fisman and Sarria-Allende, 2010).”
- Regulating away competition: the effect of regulation on entrepreneurship and employment (2017, positive): “Klapper et al. (2006) try to correct 1 More broadly, the literature on the relationship between institutional quality and economic growth suggests that countrieswith better institutions and greater levels of economic growth often have less burdensome regulatory institutions (Hall and Jones 1999;…”
- Cross Country Differences in Job Reallocation: The Role of Industry, Firm Size and Regulations (2014, positive): “The difference-in-difference approach has already been used in the corporate literature (e.g., Classens and Laeven, 2003), in the analysis of firm dynamics (Klapper et al., 2006) and in the analysis of output and employment growth as well as job flows (Micco and Pages, 2007).”
- Foundations of High Impact Entrepreneurship (2008, background): “Knight (1921) and Schumpeter (1934) draw different conclusions about firm financing due to their differing perspectives on who bears risk.”
- Institutions and Entrepreneurship Quality (2018, background): “A country’s formal regulatory institutions are critical because they can reduce the uncertainty and risk associated with entrepreneurial activity (Smallbone & Welter, 2012, Klapper et al., 2006; Busenitz et al., 2000).”
- Greasing the wheels of entrepreneurship (2007, background): “The empirical literature on the determinants of entrepreneurship focuses on four broad categories of determinants: economic, personal, social/cultural, and institutional.”
- Measuring Total Factor Productivity at the Firm Level using OECD-ORBIS (2013, methodology): “Research using Amadeus, the earlier, “European-version” of ORBIS, has explored the effects of entry regulations on business dynamics (Klapper et al., 2006), product market regulations on productivity growth (Arnold et al., 2008) and corporate taxes on investment (Schwellnus and Arnold, 2008).”
- Gender and the Business Environment for New Firm Creation (2011, background): “Studies have also found that financial development has an impact on new business creation (Klapper, Laeven, and Rajan 2006).”
- Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: a multilevel approach (2012, background): “However, entry regulations also create winners, since they shield incumbent firms from competition by new entrants (Klapper et al. 2006; Ciccone and Papaioannou 2007).”
- Access to Finance (2008, background): “Research also indicates that access to finance promotes more start-ups and that smaller firms are often the most dynamic and innovative (Klapper, Laeven, and Rajan 2006).”
- Service regulation and growth: evidence from OECD countries (2011, background): “Economy-wide restrictions such as barriers to entry have been shown to hamper economy-wide entrepreneurship by stifling growth in the number of firms (Klapper et al., 2006), by increasing industry concentration (Fisman and Sarria-Allende, 2004), and by reducing responsiveness to global demand and te”