Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “” Violations of the number of arguments and types of arguments (incorrect case marking) in a sentence lead to an N400 followed by a late positivity (71, 86, 88).”
ERP signatures of subject–verb agreement in L2 learning (2007, methodology): “Although different time windows were used in previous studies to examine different ERP components (Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996; Friederici and Frisch, 2000; Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Hagoort, 2003; Ye et al., 2006), the following windows have been consistently used (see our previous review): 150–3”
Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. (2004, background): “Anomalies in rule-governed syntax, morpho-syntax, or morpho-phonology can yield relatively early (150–500 ms) left anterior negativities (“LANs”) (Friederici, Pfeifer, & Hahne, 1993; Neville, Nicol, Barss, Forster, & Garrett, 1991; Penke et al., 1997; Weyerts, Penke, Dohrn, Clahsen, & Münte, 1997).”
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. (2007, background): “…al., 2003; van Herten et al., 2005) using contextually incongruous semantically reversible sentences and from the example given above from the study by Friederici and Frisch (2000), it is possible for a verb-argument semantic violation to evoke a P600 effect without violating animacy constraints.”