Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action

By J. Raz. 2001

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: a dynamic reference work (2003, unknown): “composite subsystems elemental .”
The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. (2004, background): “Reasoning understood in this manner constitutes a form of value-centered practical rationality (Milligan, 1980; Keefer, 1996; Keefer & Olson, 1995; Raz, 1998).”
Interpersonal Recognition: A Response to Value or a Precondition of Personhood? (2002, background): “12 For example, in Scanlon’s (1998, pp. 95–100) ‘buck-passing account’, values are analysed with the help of reasons, and according to Raz (1999, 2001) reasons are based on values.”
Cross-Cultural Epistemological Orientations to Socioscientific Issues. (2013, background): “While much has been written on these conflicting theories of morality, there is little consensus in the professional community of scholars in terms of how to frame knowledge of and about SSI (Rawls, 1999; Raz, 1998; Zeidler & Keefer, 2003).”