The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent

By Felix C. Brodbeck, Rudolf Kerschreiter, Andreas Mojzisch, Dieter Frey, S. Schulz-Hardt. 2002

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/afa385d0f2799820735327f032ce89d19e80133f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. N. Kerr
2. Robin Tindale
3. Felix C. Brodbeck
4. Andreas Mojzisch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Robin Tindale
2. Felix C. Brodbeck
3. N. Kerr
4. Rudolf Kerschreiter

Citations in the corpus

• Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. (2007, background): “The multiple effects authentic dissent (Brodbeck et al., 2002; Schulz- Hardt et al., 2005) has on information processing asymmetries have been described above.”
• Group performance and decision making. (2004, background): “Sometimes a group leader can aid in information sharing as well (Larson et al. 1996), as can having at least one group member who is an advocate for the alternative favored by unshared information (Brodbeck et al. 2002).”
• Attitudes and persuasion. (2006, unknown): “Added benefits of minority dissent included improved integrative complexity (Antonio et al. 2004), an enlarged range of unshared information considered by group members, and superior problem solving (Brodbeck et al. 2002, Choi & Levine 2004).”