A Meta-Analysis of Web-Delivered Tailored Health Behavior Change Interventions

By Mia Liza A. Lustria, S. Noar, Juliann Cortese, Stephanie K Van Stee, Robert L. Glueckauf, Junga Lee. Journal of health communication, 2013

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af6e581f52b086a5b29d5ff9fda74e6e16b29651

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Richard E. Petty
2. P. Briñol
3. J. Teeny
4. Lucy Yardley
5. Joseph J. Siev
6. Leanne G. Morrison
7. Heleen Riper
8. Zakary L. Tormala

In General Health Professions

1. Lucy Yardley
2. Leanne G. Morrison
3. Heleen Riper
4. Ann Blandford
5. Daniel Sousa
6. L. Tindall
7. N. Clarke
8. Alison Wearden

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions. (2016, background): “Tailoring can have a positive impact on intervention outcomes and engagement, but this varies between studies and contexts.(31,52) Selfdetermination theory,(53) a prominent theory of motivation, argues that autonomy is a fundamental human need that facilitates learning.”
• A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “Nonetheless, the present work does not restrict itself to a specific consumer characteristic (e.g., matching the functional basis of an attitude; Carpenter, 2012) nor to a specific content domain (e.g., matching in health domains; Rothman et al., 2020; Lustria et al., 2013).”