Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods
By Romualdas Ginevicius, Valentinas Podvezko. 2009
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Under the conditions of the country's economy restructurization, the differences between economic and social development of various regions are becoming more prominent. To smooth these differences, a number of scientific and practical problems associated with the concepts of a region, regional policy and its aims, determination of the boundaries of a region and evaluation of its development, etc., should be thoroughly investigated. To solve such complicated problems, multicriteria evaluation methods have been recently used, which could take into consideration the major aspects of economic and social development of the regions, including the environmental problems, as well as multidimensional character of the criteria, different directions of their changing and significances. Quantitative evaluation of social and economic region's development allows us to determine the changes, taking place in this development. This, in turn, shows the effectiveness of the EU structural funds, national programmes ...
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af44f0c4fa2ca7f6e0bcfab986d8da35aa3ef04d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Jurgita Antucheviciene
- Algimantas Zakarevicius
- Zenonas Turskis
- Abbas Mardani
- Dalia Streimikiene
- Tomas Balezentis
- Alvydas Balezentis
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method (2013, unknown): “COPRAS, along with SAW and TOPSIS, were also used in the evaluation of social and economic development of Lithuanian regions [47].”
- The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS (2011, unknown): “Thus, the evaluation of the development rate of Lithuanian regions (Ginevicius, Podvezko 2009), based on these two methods (see Table 10), yielded practically the same results (with the difference being 10 -4 ) because only two out of fourteen criteria were minimizing.”
- Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, unknown): “Ginevicius and Podvezko[82] also used SAW, TOPSIS and COPRAS and found similarity, albeit not entirely equal, in the ranking of alternatives.”
- Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria (2010, background): “Also for sustainable development problems Ginevičius and Podvezko (2009) use multiple criteria evaluation methods that can take into consideration the major aspects of economic, social and environmental development as well as multidimensional character of the development criteria, different…”