Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability
By Emma Mulliner, Naglis Malys, Vida Maliene. 2016
496 citations recorded by the source corpus.
While affordability is traditionally assessed in economic terms, this paper tests a new assessment method that draws closer links with sustainability by considering economic, social and environmental criteria that impact on a household’s quality of life. The paper presents an empirical application and comparison of six different multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for the purpose of assessing sustainable housing affordability.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48d4dd44d9e332e2f50c4c6d3c110d3e8958e104
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Peng Wang
- Rizal Hamid
- Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki
- E. Lozano-Mínguez
- Peide Liu
- Samira Vakilipour
- Maznah Mat Kasim
- Athanasios Kolios
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Some q‐Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and their Applications to Multiple‐Attribute Decision Making (2018, background): “4 In real decision process, an important problem is how to express the attribute value more efficiently and accurately.”
- A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs (2016, result): “Results obtained from the deterministic application of the different methods employed in this paper can be supported by the findings of other studies for similar problems comparing different MCDM methods, i.e., [82–84].”
- Comparison between Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Evaluating the Quality of Life at Different Spatial Levels (2021, methodology): “The similarity in the rankings obtained by different methods of multi-criteria decisionmaking can be further demonstrated by analysis of pairwise correlation [57].”
- A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria (2021, methodology): “Usually, the Pearson correlation test is conducted for this purpose [48,49].”