The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS

376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods (2014, methodology): “2011 FAMCDM Podvezko 2011 Comparative analysis SAW and COPRAS Antuchevičienė et al.”
Biodiesel from microalgae: The use of multi-criteria decision analysis for strain selection (2015, background): “The normalizing equations are [24]: For maximizing/positive/benefit criteria (gets better with increasing numerical value):”
A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments (2017, methodology): “Podvezko [139], compared the features of SAW and COPRAS approaches based on different”
An objective multi-criteria approach to optimization using MOORA method and interval grey numbers (2012, methodology): “For more comparison of some of the mentioned MCDM methods see Podvezko (2011), Ginevicius (2008), Ginevicius et al.”
Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview (2011, methodology): “Podvezko (2011) The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS Method Reference Considered problem EL EC TR E Thiel (2008) Peculiarities of method applying Ulubeyli and Kazaz (2009) Selection problem Radziszewska-Zielina (2010) Partner selection problem Wachowicz (2010) ELECTRE-TRI method…”
An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (2013, neutral): “(Podvezko, 2011, p. 137).”