An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method
By Emma Mulliner, Kieran Smallbone, Vida Maliene. 2013
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77eb59651151bcab2e0b0d4fdf39e3817b3dc295
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Reza Maknoon
- Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani
- Marco Cinelli
- Vida Maliene
- Emma Mulliner
- Naglis Malys
- Michael Gonzalez
Citations in the corpus
- Multiple nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods (2014, methodology): “Multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM), commonly known as multi criteria decision aid (MCDA) and multi-criteria analysis (MCA), is a set of methods in which the aggregation and consideration of numerous (often conflicting) criteria to choose, rank, sort or describe a set of alternatives to aid a d”
- How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy (2020, background): “management [131], ecosystem services governance [109], sensors placement [13], resilience and sustainability quantification [107,61], energy policy ranking [42], product recovery activities [9], supply chain management [67], waste recycling [66], freight selector [53], housing affordability [122], r”
- Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability (2016, background): “It is important that such issues are tackled simultaneouslyand accordingly a broader range ofcriteria ought to be considered in the assessment of housing affordability [30]).”