Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria
By Jurgita Antucheviciene, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Algimantas Zakarevicius. 2010
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Decision making in construction management has been always complicated especially if there were more than one criterion under consideration. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) has been often applied for complex decisions in construction when a lot of criteria were involved. Traditional MCDM methods, however, operate with independent and conflicting criteria. While in every day problems a decision maker often faces interactive and interrelated criteria. Accordingly, the need of improving and supplementing the methodology of compromise decisions arose. It was proposed to supplement TOPSIS (Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method and integrate the Mahalanobis distance in the usual algorythm of TOPSIS. Mahalanobis distance measure offered an option to take the correlations between the criteria into considerations while making the decision. A case study of building redevelopment in Lithuanian rural areas was presented that demonstrated the application of the pr...
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6edb1735a21f984527ff59eeb9eaf0019e68f03c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Zenonas Turskis
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Violeta Keršulienė
- Abbas Mardani
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Kannan Govindan
- Martin Brandt Jepsen
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Zenonas Turskis
- Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
- Violeta Keršulienė
- Abbas Mardani
- Ahmad Jusoh
- Tomas Balezentis
- Alvydas Balezentis
- Norhayati Zakuan
Citations in the corpus
- Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) (2010, methodology): “…methods based on a reference point or goal such as the Reference Point Method which is used in TOPSIS (Hwang and Yoon 1981; Zavadskas et al. 2006; Antuchevičienė et al. 2010), VIKOR (Opricovic and Tzeng 2004), COPRAS-G (Zavadskas et al. 2008), MOORA (Brauers and Zavadskas 2006) and Goal…”
- Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview (2011, methodology): “…the simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) Utility Theory Additive (UTA) Jacquet-Lagréze and Siskos (1982) Authors TOPSIS Hwang and Yoon (1981) Authors TOPSIS Antuchevičienė et al. (2010) The case study proved that the proposed TOPSIS-M (TOPSIS applying Mahalanobis distance measure)…”