Paradigms of Personality Assessment

By J. Wiggins, R. S. Behrends, Y. Ben-Porath, S. Blatt, Paul T. Costa, M. Gurtman, D. McAdams, R. Piedmont, Aaron L. Pincus, K. K. Trobst. 2003

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adb608caea600be9cd2660cf8cf959e3d151c6eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Structural and Mean-Level Analyses of the Five-Factor Model and Locus of Control (2005, background): “That finding is consistent with the hypothesis that in collectivist cultures, Love and Dominance may be more salient axes than Extraversion and Agreeableness (Kallasmaa, Allik, Realo, & McCrae, 2000).”
The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). (2008, background): “For example, although the basic traits of dominance (or agency) and warmth (or communion) have long been seen as two of the most fundamental dimensions of human personality (Wiggins, 2003), the five-factor model has no factor that centrally includes either dominance or warmth.”
Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex (2009, background): “Relevant information on the reliability, validity, and structure of the IAS has been presented in many sources (e.g., Gurtman & Pincus, 2000; Wiggins & Broughton, 1991; Wiggins, 2003), including the test manual (Wiggins, 1995).”
Circumplex Measures of Interpersonal Constructs (2012, background): “The interpersonal circle or interpersonal circumplex has in recent decades become the most popular model for conceptualizing, organizing, and assessing interpersonal dispositions (Wiggins, 2003).”
A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. (2006, background): “But today evidence for broad consistencies in individual differences, their stability over time, their psychobiological underpinnings, and their efficacy in predicting important behavioral trends and life outcomes is pervasive and convincing (eg, Hogan, Johnson, & Briggs, 1997; Matthews, Deary, & Wh”
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. (2006, background): “1 The Big Five serve as the dominant model of personality structure in trait psychology (eg, Funder, 2001; but see Block, 1995), and in clinical psychology there is growing interest in using the Big Five to understand Axis I disorders (eg, Trull & Sher, 1994), Axis II disorders (Costa & Widiger, 200”
Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. (2005, background): “…are those of Cloninger (2000), Costa and McCrae (1990), Eysenck (1987), Miles and Hempel (2004), the interpersonal circumplex (Benjamin, 1996; Wiggins, 2003), Millon et al. (1996), Millon, Millon and Davis (1994), Tellegen (Watson, Wiese, Vaidya, & Tellegen, 1999), Tyrer (2000), and…”
Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “I am sceptical that any single model of the different levels of personality will serve all purposes (Rychlak, 1968; Waugh et al., 2017; Wiggins, 2003).”
Towards A Pan–Cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 Psycholexical Studies (2014, methodology): “For a delineation of these three concepts, we make use of Wiggins’ (2003) rendering of Bakan’s (1966) metaconcepts of agency and communion and of Lorand’s (2000) views on ‘order’.”
Contextualized Personality, beyond Traits (2015, background): “Together, these constructs have been deemed sufficient to characterize personality characteristics within a number of assessment paradigms, including those pertinent to characteristics found at the second and third levels of McAdams’ (1995) model (Wiggins, 2003).”