Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground.

By T. Widiger, E. Simonsen. Journal of Personality Disorders, 2005

676 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41735f30205b5a0dcbb9082a5bd78e6e12519c32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. (2007, background): “…utility (Widiger et al. 2005), but the overarching theme and consensus were clear: The current categorical system is scientifically untenable (Widiger & Simonsen 2005), and as Allen Frances declared almost 15 years ago with regard to implementing a dimensional system for PD in the DSM, “Not…”
Personality and meaning in life (2006, background): “It comprises all aspects of personality proposed by the Big 5 model, but unites Extraversion and Openness in one factor due to their inter-correlation (for evidence for four main factors, see also Ashton, Lee, & Goldberg, 2004; Widiger & Simonsen, 2005).”
DSM-5 and the Path Toward Empirically Based and Clinically Useful Conceptualization of Personality and Psychopathology (2014, neutral): “Empirical models were summarized early in the DSM-5 process by Widiger and Simonsen (2005), and these models as well as the DSM-5 model converge around five broad domains of personality variation: (a) a tendency to experience diverse negative emotions versus being emotionally stable; (b) a tendency…”
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY ORGANIZATION, REFLECTIVE FUNCTIONING, AND PSYCHIATRIC CLASSIFICATION IN BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER (2010, methodology): “The STIPO contributes to proposals for a more unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders (Krueger, 2005) and to proposals for dimensional classifications (Widiger & Simonsen, 2005).”
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. (2008, methodology): “…models of personality structure that have been associated conceptually with the DSM personality disorders (Clark, 2007; Trull & Durrett, 2005; Widiger & Simonsen, 2005), such as the three three-factor model of Tellegen, as assessed by the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ;…”
Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology (2009, background): “For example, it appears to be the case that four broad personality dimensions and their underlying facets effectively describe the many different forms of dysfunction currently represented by the full set of personality disorders (Widiger & Simonsen 2005; Widiger et al. 2005).”
Initial Construction of a Maladaptive Personality Trait Model and Inventory for DSM-5 (2011, methodology): “Hence, in addition to the four major domains identified by Widiger & Simonsen (2005), we also sought to identify and measure traits in a fifth domain of psychoticism, resulting in a model that, at the domain level, bears a strong resemblance to Harkness’s Personality Psychopathology 5 model of…”
The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies (2017, neutral): “…be-tween personality and psychopathology is beyond the scope of the present paper, we should note that the taxonomy of normal personality has played a major role in shaping dimensional models of personality pathology (Widiger & Mullins-Sweatt, 2009; Widiger & Simonsen, 2005; Widiger & Trull, 2007).”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, background): “By one count, there are 18 alternative proposals for a dimensional model of personality disorder (Widiger & Simonsen, 2005).”
Maladaptive Personality at Work: Exploring the Darkness (2014, background): “The adaptive variants of these, respectively, are Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness (Widiger & Simonsen, 2005).”
Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “…personality researchers around the viability of hierarchical trait models for conceptualizing individual differences, in which Big Five dimensions occupy a particularly useful level of analysis (Goldberg, 1990; Markon, Krueger, & Watson, 2005; McCrae & Costa Jr, 1997; Widiger & Simonsen, 2005).”