The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.

By B. Donnellan, F. Oswald, Brendan M. Baird, Richard E. Lucas. Psychological Assessment, 2006

2,518 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f534a60503e0de9590ca3e13891f95bb205132d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede's cultural dimensions (2011, methodology): “In addition, the use of the 20-itemMiniNEO extends the original research of Donnellan et al. (2006) to another population group, the educated and experienced business professional using the internet – confirming it as a useful tool for researchers needing a very-short assessment of the FFM.”
Does it take two to Tangle? Subordinates’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Abusive Supervision (2015, methodology): “Participants’ FFM personality traits were assessed with a 20-item short form of the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP)—FFM measure (Goldberg 1999) that was developed by Donnellan et al. (2006). Sample items are ‘‘get upset easily’’ (neuroticism), ‘‘sympathize with others’ feelings’’ (agreeab”
A business frame perspective on why perceptions of top management's bottom‐line mentality result in employees’ good and bad behaviors (2019, methodology): “We controlled for employee conscientiousness using a 4-item scale from Donnellan et al. (2006).”
Automatic personality assessment through social media language. (2015, background): “…personality averaged r (cid:2) .38, which is lower than those typically observed with novel self-report questionnaires (where r s typically exceed .70; e.g., Donnellan et al., 2006; Gos-ling et al., 2003) or informant reports (where r s range between .40 and .60; Vazire, 2006; Watson et al., 2000).”
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (2013, background): “…of conspiracist themes; however, a short measure is desirable so as to avoid practical problems associated with lengthy questionnaires such as participant frustration, careless responding, drop-out, and reluctance to take part in future studies (see Schmidt et al., 2003; Donnellan et al., 2006).”
Personality, personal values and cooperation preferences in public goods games: A longitudinal study (2011, result): “The Cronbach’s alphas for the five TIPI scales in our study were very similar to the findings by Donnellan et al. (2006), Ehrhart et al. (2009) and Gosling et al. (2003), i.e.: Extraversion (a = 0.73), Agreeableness (a = 0.32), Conscientiousness (a = 0.49), Emotional Stability (a = 0.53) and…”