To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective
By H. Chesbrough. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020
516 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Covid-19 has severely tested our public health systems. Recovering from Covid-19 will soon test our economic systems. Innovation will have an important role to play in recovering from the aftermath of the coronavirus. This article discusses both how to manage innovation as part of that recovery, and also derives some lessons from how we have responded to the virus so far, and what those lessons imply for managing innovation during the recovery.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad80e9730d8a5f3104585dd367a1be810bfccfc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- David M. Gann
- Martin W. Wallin
- Linus Dahlander
- Sascha Kraus
- Bernd Ebersberger
- Andreas Kuckertz
- Vanessa Ratten
- Marcel Bogers
In Management Information Systems
- David M. Gann
- Virginia Simón-Moya
- Javier Sendra-García
- Sascha Kraus
- Linus Dahlander
- Bernd Ebersberger
- Andreas Kuckertz
- Vanessa Ratten
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- M. Breier
- Raj V. Mahto
- Virginia Simón-Moya
- Sascha Kraus
- Susanne Durst
- Linus Dahlander
- Bernd Ebersberger
- Andreas Kuckertz
Citations in the corpus
- COVID‐19 and entrepreneurship: Future research directions (2021, background): “The rapid global dissemination of COVID-19 was due to human-to-human transmission capacity (Chesbrough, 2020).”
- Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis (2020, background): “Conceptual arguments (Chesbrough, 2020) have already pointed to open innovation as an important approach that might enable fast and innovative answers to COVID19–related problems and could thus be critical in answering to the pandemic’s challenges.”
- How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward (2021, background): “In the early stages of the pandemic, companies and other organizations formed often unexpected collaborations to solve acute problems (see e.g., Dahlander and Wallin, 2020; Chesbrough, 2020).”
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on micro, small, and medium-sized Enterprises operating in Pakistan (2020, unknown): “Besides, perfume producers and distilleries can also turn to produce hand sanitizers (Chesbrough, 2020).”
- Temporary business model innovation – SMEs’ innovation response to the Covid‐19 crisis (2021, background): “First, we add to the SME crisis management literature (e.g., Eggers, 2020) and the growing stream of studies proposing innovation and temporary BMI as potential strategies to cope with the Covid- 19 crisis (Chesbrough, 2020; Kraus et al., 2020a; Wenzel et al., 2020).”
- The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis (2020, background): “These perspectives include human resources (Carnevale & Hatak, 2020), innovation (Chesbrough, 2020), entrepreneurship (Kuckertz et al.”
- The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis (2020, unknown): “Innovations can also be external (Chesbrough, 2020).”