EVALUATING CODING DECISIONS

By R. Orwin, Jack L. Vevea. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, 2019

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad0be2009e7cfcfb094ece86dc0b49e60247e192

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Malcolm Patterson
2. Caroline Knight
3. J. Dawson

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Ernest H. O’Boyle
2. Malcolm Patterson
3. Caroline Knight
4. J. Dawson

In Transportation

1. Ernest H. O’Boyle
2. Malcolm Patterson
3. Caroline Knight
4. J. Dawson

Citations in the corpus

• Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review (2019, methodology): “44, intervention delivery method), indicating good agreement (Orwin, 1994).”
• Publication Bias in Strategic Management Research (2017, background): “This helps to reduce biasing effects that could arise if our results were based exclusively on our own selection criteria and coding decisions (Orwin, 1994).”
• Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019, unknown): “75).(47) Disagreement was resolved through discussion.”
• The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review (2021, background): “This led to κ = 0.89 inter rater agreement on inclusion/exclusion illustrating excellent agreement (Orwin, 1994).”
• Organizational Controls and Performance Outcomes: A Meta‐Analytic Assessment and Extension (2018, unknown): “(Orwin and Vevea, 2009; Perreault and Leigh, 1989).”